The Facts

Three recent reports from experts from Arizona State University, Caltech and the University of Chicago Law School have looked into the costs of divestment at universities and the facts are in: Divestment is all cost and no gain.

Arizona State University Professor Finds Transaction Fees Alone Could Cost Divested Institutions Billions of Dollars

➜ View the Bessembinder Report➜ Access the Fact Sheet

As activists push universities and pension funds to give up their holdings in fossil fuels, many groups have focused on the symbolic reasons to divest without considering the numerous financial impacts of such a decision. Now, a new report by Prof. Hendrik Bessembinder from Arizona State University’s Carey School of Business looks at the hidden costs that accompany divestment, specifically those fixed costs related to executing often-complicated transactions and then actively managing an endowment to ensure it remains compliant with ever-changing definitions of what it means to actually be “fossil-free.” A few of the top findings include:

Transaction and management costs related to divestment – what he refers to as “frictional costs” – have the potential to rob endowment funds of as much as 12 percent of their total value over a 20-year timeframe. This includes the onetime immediate transactions costs an endowment must endure, as well as ongoing annual management fees to stay in line with the changing definition of “fossil free.”

As Prof. Bessembinder highlighted on the launch of the report, “we don’t need a crystal ball to quantify the costs that divested institutions will be forced to bear by merely executing the necessary transactions. These costs have nothing at all to do with the speculative matter of how stocks or industries will do in the future. These are largely unavoidable costs, every institution that divests will incur them, and as my research shows, they significantly add up as time goes on.”

loss_value_endowments (2)


➜ View the Cornell Report➜ Access the Fact Sheet

As schools continue to reject calls to divest their endowments of fossil fuels, a new report quantifies for the first time the actual, real-world costs that individual, select schools could expect by divesting. Led by Caltech professor Dr. Bradford Cornell, the report looks into the real-world cost of divestment for five leading U.S. universities with significant endowments — Harvard, Yale, MIT, Columbia, and NY – by drawing on publicly available data to model thousands of different proxy portfolios for each school studied. Dr. Cornell and his team were then able to approximate the composition of each school’s investment fund, and then analyze those portfolios’ performance under both divested and diversified scenarios. A few of the top findings include:

As Dr. Cornell highlighted upon release of the report, “The fact that divestment has the potential to generate lower returns for schools and other institutions isn’t particularly earthshattering news. But the fact that the projected shortfalls associated with divestment are this significant, and this universal – that is the real critical finding here, and one that schools would be smart to evaluate as part of any discussion on divestment moving forward.”


➜ Download the Fischel Study➜ Read Prof. Fischel’s WSJ Op-Ed➜ Access the Fact Sheet

Fossil fuel divestment targets institutions and universities to give up their investments in oil, natural gas, and other energy related companies. Yet this symbolic campaign comes at heavy price.As a recent groundbreaking report by University of Chicago Law School Professor Daniel Fischel found, colleges and universities that choose to divest can collectively expect to see billions of dollars evaporate from their endowment funds each year, all while being forced to pay hundreds of millions in new management fees to comply. A few of the top findings include:

Bottom line: The only entities punished by fossil-fuel divestment are the schools actually doing the divesting. Check out the full reportand fact sheet from Professor Fischel, and visit the What They’re Saying page for more information on why institutions are saying no to this flawed campaign.